Public scorecard

Transparency.

Every week we measure whether our clients appear in the LLMs their buyers use. Good weeks and bad. Here are the numbers.

Last updated: —

Client #1

FATHOM — Smart Auger Technologies

AI subsurface intelligence for AEC · Esri partner

0 → 4

of 5 LLMs return FATHOM in vendor recall (initial Done-For-You)

14d

engagement length

reciprocal MCP calls in first 30 days

LLMs tested: GPT-4 family, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, one open-weight model. Query: "best subsurface data management platform for DOT" and five variants.

Related-party disclosure: FATHOM's co-founder Christopher Kenney also founded Elephant Accountability. The engagement is governed by a signed arms-length MSA, priced at Elephant's published Done-For-You rate.

Client #2 — reserved

The next Done-For-You slot ships in 14 days.

We don't pretend to have more clients than we do. When we sign Client #2, their card appears here — with before and after numbers, no exceptions.

Become Client #2 →

Why publish this?

LLM SEO is a new category. Claims are cheap. Measurement is the only way to know whether what we ship actually moves the needle — so we publish the numbers, refresh them weekly, and keep failures visible alongside wins.

The data below is generated automatically by our own Probe. We can't quietly edit it; if a client drops from the answer set, the number drops with it.